How could NASA possibly land on the moon when it's impossible to reach the moon through the Earth's dome? Why are they making up such an obvious lie?

Why can we observe satellites orbiting at different altitudes?

Other Quora users have criticized questions like this, labeling them trolling and dismissing them outright. Yet, I believe addressing misinformation is crucial, even when it feels futile. Shouldn’t someone be out there tooting the truth horn, rather than sweeping these issues under the rug? Engaging with conspiracy theories requires patience and clarity to encourage critical thinking. Instead of assuming deception, consider:

The cultural fascination with domes extends beyond Flat Earth ideas, appearing in works like Under the Dome, a TV series based on Stephen King’s 2009 novel. In this story, a mysterious, indestructible dome traps a small town, exploring themes of isolation and survival. It’s a cool science fiction concept—but fiction nonetheless.

How often do you watch the news on TV?

Observing the evidence yourself, through telescopes or astronomy clubs, offers the best path to understanding. Let’s be clear: there is no dome preventing space travel. The Earth is spherical, as science has demonstrated for millennia. It’s up to us to rely on critical thinking and evidence to counteract misinformation.

Despite this, Flat Earthers remain unlikely to listen. Many dismiss NASA and other sources of evidence outright, reinforcing their beliefs within echo chambers fueled by misinformation. The Internet, while a tool for spreading knowledge, also provides fertile ground for conspiracies like Pizzagate—a baseless theory claiming a D.C. pizzeria was central to a child-trafficking ring involving high-ranking officials. The conspiracy collapsed under scrutiny, but not before inciting violence when a man entered the restaurant with a rifle to “investigate.” Incidents like these highlight how manipulation, if unchecked, could drag society backward into an age of ignorance.

The model also distorts geography south of the Equator. For example, Australia is grossly misrepresented, with some extreme proponents even denying its existence entirely. This claim, rooted in an inability to reconcile Australia’s dimensions and location with their model, is easily debunked. Millions of people live in and travel to Australia every year, and its geography is extensively mapped and studied. Yet such distortions highlight the lengths to which Flat Earthers will go to preserve their worldview.

What is the most heartbreaking thing your child has told you?

In the Flat Earth model, celestial bodies such as the Sun, Moon, and stars are often believed to be either attached to or projected onto a dome-like structure. According to this view, the Sun and Moon are much smaller and closer than described by standard astronomy, existing only a few thousand miles above the Earth rather than millions of miles away. Their movements are explained as being mounted on or moving across this dome. Flat Earthers claim that the apparent rising and setting of the Sun and Moon are caused by "perspective" rather than the Earth's rotation. Standard astronomy attributes this to the horizon’s curvature. This explanation fails to account for the Sun’s consistent apparent size throughout the day, which contradicts what we would observe if it were merely receding into the distance.

How do meteor showers occur if a dome exists?

Space travel, according to Flat Earthers, is impossible because the dome is an impenetrable barrier. Consequently, they claim NASA’s missions and all space exploration efforts are elaborate fabrications designed to deceive the public into believing in a spherical Earth. Evidence from NASA and other organizations, such as European Space Agency, Roscosmos, and SpaceX, provides extensive proof of space travel. Retroreflectors left on the Moon during Apollo missions still function today, and thousands of images, videos, and satellite observations confirm Earth’s spherical shape, all contradicting the existence of a dome.

Finals Film Study: Thunder offense vs. Pacers' defense - NBA

Flat Earth proponents view Earth as a stationary disk with a domed "firmament" above it, a concept derived from religious texts with no scientific basis. This dome is often imagined as glass, plexiglass, or an invisible, god-created force field. Ironically, force fields are a staple of science fiction—a genre that thrives on space travel, which Flat Earthers reject outright. Shows like Star Trek and Stargate SG-1 popularize force fields as advanced technologies, yet Flat Earthers borrow these ideas to construct a static and immovable dome over Earth while dismissing the space-exploration narratives that inspired them.

How do rival nations maintain consistent space programs if it’s all fabricated?